2008/2009 BYLAWS MOTION RESULTS

 

Below are the voting results on the bylaws motion proposed by Drs. Charles Parshall and William Miller at the ACVO business meeting, November 6, 2009 in Chicago, Il. Votes were collected via mailed ballot between October 16 and November 13th with votes postmarked as late as the 13th counted. Votes were also cast during the business meeting. Only one vote was permitted per eligible Diplomate. All Active and Emeritus Diplomates were eligible to vote.
   
Voting results: The motion to amend the bylaws did not pass.
Number of Diplomates eligible to vote: 330
Number required for passage of a bylaws amendment (2/3 of eligible voters): 220
Number of total votes received: 266 (80% of diplomates voted)
Number present (signed in) at the business meeting: 203 (50 already voted via mail; 12 abstained)
Number required for quorum (1/3 of eligible voters): 110 (applies to ability to take action at business meeting, not the ballot)
   

 Summary of votes

Yes

No

Could not be counted

Total

Mailed in (before and after meeting)

72

48

15

135

Voted at meeting

20

111

0

131

TOTAL

92

159

15

266

1) Communication/discussion, both among members of the Board and between the Board and the Membership, especially at times other than during the annual meeting. 2) Lack of a set of clearly defined goals that allows us to evaluate progress and effectively allocate resources 3) A turnover in leadership that challenges follow-through of activities that take more than 1 year to complete.     Major Opportunities Before the College (as of 2006) 1) Expansion of the annual conference 2) To partner with related organizations (The Foundation, International Organizations, CERF, etc.) to promote common goals and leverage our plan 3) To more clearly delineate between the certifying and membership function of the College. Top Threats to the College (as of 2006) 1) Potential loss of our status as the preeminent veterinary ophthalmic organization in the world. 2) Continual and multiple threats of legal action against the College stemming from certain aspects of the certifying process. 3) Insufficient financial reserves in the event of a catastrophic event affecting the annual meeting.

>